<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!--generated by http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu-->
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ev="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/event/" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:itunesu="http://www.itunesu.com/feed" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:s="http://purl.org/steeple" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu"/>
    <copyright>© Oxford University</copyright>
    <description>Podcasts from the Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, an independent institution affiliated with the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies at the University of Oxford.</description>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:23:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <link>http://www.fljs.org/</link>
    <title>Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</title>
    <!--JORUM dc:subject and dc:creator-->
    <!--END OF JORUM dc:subject and dc:creator-->
    <itunes:author>Oxford University</itunes:author>
    <itunes:category text="Education">
      <itunes:category text="Higher Education"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <itunes:image href="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/300by300_fljs.jpg"/>
    
    <item>
      <itunes:order>1</itunes:order>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>socio-legal</category>
      <category>norms</category>
      <category>norm entrepreneurship</category>
      <category>europe</category>
      <category>human rights</category>
      <category domain="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/recording_date">2012-01-11</category>
      <description>Terry Davis, former Secretary General of the Council of Europe, gives the final keynote speech for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective conference</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2012-01-18:112351:087:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0501-davis.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>Terry Davis, former Secretary General of the Council of Europe, gives the final keynote speech for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective conference Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:subtitle>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</creativeCommons:license>
      <category domain="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/oer/">ukoer</category>
      <itunes:summary>Terry Davis, former Secretary General of the Council of Europe, gives the final keynote speech for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective conference Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>law,socio-legal,norms,norm entrepreneurship,europe,human rights,2012-01-11</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Terry Davis</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>1148</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0501-davis.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="18370141" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>Keynote Speech</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>2</itunes:order>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>socio-legal</category>
      <category>norms</category>
      <category>norm entrepreneurship</category>
      <category>europe</category>
      <category>human rights</category>
      <category domain="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/recording_date">2012-01-11</category>
      <description>Professor Richard Caplan, Oxford, gives a talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2012-01-17:102648:372:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0403-caplan.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>Professor Richard Caplan, Oxford, gives a talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:subtitle>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</creativeCommons:license>
      <category domain="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/oer/">ukoer</category>
      <itunes:summary>Professor Richard Caplan, Oxford, gives a talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'? Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>law,socio-legal,norms,norm entrepreneurship,europe,human rights,2012-01-11</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Richard Caplan</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>1243</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0403-caplan.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="19896110" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>The International 'Responsibility to Protect' and the 'Responsibility to Rebuild'- A Dual Agenda</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>3</itunes:order>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>socio-legal</category>
      <category>norms</category>
      <category>norm entrepreneurship</category>
      <category>europe</category>
      <category>human rights</category>
      <category domain="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/recording_date">2012-01-11</category>
      <description>Professor Valsamis Mitsilegas, School of Law, Queen Mary, University of London gives a talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2012-01-17:102430:081:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0401-mitsilegas.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>Professor Valsamis Mitsilegas, School of Law, Queen Mary, University of London gives a talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:subtitle>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</creativeCommons:license>
      <category domain="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/oer/">ukoer</category>
      <itunes:summary>Professor Valsamis Mitsilegas, School of Law, Queen Mary, University of London gives a talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'? Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>law,socio-legal,norms,norm entrepreneurship,europe,human rights,2012-01-11</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Valsamis Mitsilegas</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>882</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0401-mitsilegas.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="14115734" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>From Conditionality to Disconnection-The Ambivalent Relationship between the Council of Europe and the European Union in the Field of Criminal Justice</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>4</itunes:order>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>socio-legal</category>
      <category>norms</category>
      <category>norm entrepreneurship</category>
      <category>europe</category>
      <category>human rights</category>
      <category domain="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/recording_date">2012-01-11</category>
      <description>Dr Daniel Smilov, University of Sofia, gives a talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?  It would be easy for states not to cooperate, or subvert 'norm production' inside the Council of Europe itself. Yet member states tend not to do this. This is part of what former Council of Europe Secretary General Terry Davis has referred to as 'the best kept secret in Europe'. The workshop sets out to unpack this 'secret' by combining a review of current research on the emergence and institutionalization of international norms using the Council of Europe as a focus for a discussion about the conceptual and empirical challenges of studying norm entrepreneurship.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2012-01-17:102203:752:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0303-smilov.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dr Daniel Smilov, University of Sofia, gives a talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:subtitle>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</creativeCommons:license>
      <category domain="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/oer/">ukoer</category>
      <itunes:summary>Dr Daniel Smilov, University of Sofia, gives a talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?  It would be easy for states not to cooperate, or subvert 'norm production' inside the Council of Europe itself. Yet member states tend not to do this. This is part of what former Council of Europe Secretary General Terry Davis has referred to as 'the best kept secret in Europe'. The workshop sets out to unpack this 'secret' by combining a review of current research on the emergence and institutionalization of international norms using the Council of Europe as a focus for a discussion about the conceptual and empirical challenges of studying norm entrepreneurship. Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>law,socio-legal,norms,norm entrepreneurship,europe,human rights,2012-01-11</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Daniel Smilov</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>978</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0303-smilov.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="15660929" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>Hard Law, Soft Law and the Politics of Standards: Regulating Political Parties in Europe</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>5</itunes:order>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>socio-legal</category>
      <category>norms</category>
      <category>norm entrepreneurship</category>
      <category>europe</category>
      <category>human rights</category>
      <category domain="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/recording_date">2012-01-11</category>
      <description>Professor Rainer Hoffmann, University of Frankfurt gives a talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?  It would be easy for states not to cooperate, or subvert 'norm production' inside the Council of Europe itself. Yet member states tend not to do this. This is part of what former Council of Europe Secretary General Terry Davis has referred to as 'the best kept secret in Europe'. The workshop sets out to unpack this 'secret' by combining a review of current research on the emergence and institutionalization of international norms using the Council of Europe as a focus for a discussion about the conceptual and empirical challenges of studying norm entrepreneurship.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2012-01-17:102010:609:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0302-hoffmann.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>Professor Rainer Hoffmann, University of Frankfurt gives a talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:subtitle>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</creativeCommons:license>
      <category domain="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/oer/">ukoer</category>
      <itunes:summary>Professor Rainer Hoffmann, University of Frankfurt gives a talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?  It would be easy for states not to cooperate, or subvert 'norm production' inside the Council of Europe itself. Yet member states tend not to do this. This is part of what former Council of Europe Secretary General Terry Davis has referred to as 'the best kept secret in Europe'. The workshop sets out to unpack this 'secret' by combining a review of current research on the emergence and institutionalization of international norms using the Council of Europe as a focus for a discussion about the conceptual and empirical challenges of studying norm entrepreneurship. Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>law,socio-legal,norms,norm entrepreneurship,europe,human rights,2012-01-11</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Rainer Hoffmann</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>1054</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0302-hoffmann.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="16877608" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities: From Standard-Setting to Standard-Implementation</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>6</itunes:order>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>socio-legal</category>
      <category>norms</category>
      <category>norm entrepreneurship</category>
      <category>europe</category>
      <category>human rights</category>
      <category domain="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/recording_date">2012-01-11</category>
      <description>Dr Kundai Sithole, Oxford, gives the seventh talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?  It would be easy for states not to cooperate, or subvert 'norm production' inside the Council of Europe itself. Yet member states tend not to do this. This is part of what former Council of Europe Secretary General Terry Davis has referred to as 'the best kept secret in Europe'. The workshop sets out to unpack this 'secret' by combining a review of current research on the emergence and institutionalization of international norms using the Council of Europe as a focus for a discussion about the conceptual and empirical challenges of studying norm entrepreneurship.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2012-01-17:101700:661:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0301-sithole.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dr Kundai Sithole, Oxford, gives the seventh talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:subtitle>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</creativeCommons:license>
      <category domain="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/oer/">ukoer</category>
      <itunes:summary>Dr Kundai Sithole, Oxford, gives the seventh talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?  It would be easy for states not to cooperate, or subvert 'norm production' inside the Council of Europe itself. Yet member states tend not to do this. This is part of what former Council of Europe Secretary General Terry Davis has referred to as 'the best kept secret in Europe'. The workshop sets out to unpack this 'secret' by combining a review of current research on the emergence and institutionalization of international norms using the Council of Europe as a focus for a discussion about the conceptual and empirical challenges of studying norm entrepreneurship. Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>law,socio-legal,norms,norm entrepreneurship,europe,human rights,2012-01-11</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Kundai Sithole</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>1106</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0301-sithole.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="17706421" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>The Council of Europe and the death penalty: intergovernmental legitimation as enabling and constraining</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>7</itunes:order>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>socio-legal</category>
      <category>norms</category>
      <category>norm entrepreneurship</category>
      <category>europe</category>
      <category>human rights</category>
      <category domain="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/recording_date">2012-01-11</category>
      <description>Manuel Lezertua, Director of Legal Advice and Public International Law (Jurisconsult), Council of Europe: gives the sixth talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2012-01-17:101410:722:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0203-lezertua.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>Manuel Lezertua, Director of Legal Advice and Public International Law (Jurisconsult), Council of Europe: gives the sixth talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:subtitle>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</creativeCommons:license>
      <category domain="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/oer/">ukoer</category>
      <itunes:summary>Manuel Lezertua, Director of Legal Advice and Public International Law (Jurisconsult), Council of Europe: gives the sixth talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'? Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>law,socio-legal,norms,norm entrepreneurship,europe,human rights,2012-01-11</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Manuel Lezertua</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>1125</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0203-lezertua.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="18013203" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>Sixty Years of Normative Production in the Council of Europe: The Legal Nature, Elaboration, Challenges and Trends of the CoE Conventions</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>8</itunes:order>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>socio-legal</category>
      <category>norms</category>
      <category>norm entrepreneurship</category>
      <category>europe</category>
      <category>human rights</category>
      <category domain="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/recording_date">2012-01-11</category>
      <description>Dr Gwendolyn Sasse, Oxford, gives the fifth talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2012-01-17:101200:609:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0202-sasse.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dr Gwendolyn Sasse, Oxford, gives the fifth talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:subtitle>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</creativeCommons:license>
      <category domain="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/oer/">ukoer</category>
      <itunes:summary>Dr Gwendolyn Sasse, Oxford, gives the fifth talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'? Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>law,socio-legal,norms,norm entrepreneurship,europe,human rights,2012-01-11</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Gwendolyn Sasse,</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>1040</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0202-sasse.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="16641043" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>Explaining the Momentum behind the Council of Europe's Norm Entrepreneurship</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>9</itunes:order>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>socio-legal</category>
      <category>norms</category>
      <category>norm entrepreneurship</category>
      <category>europe</category>
      <category>human rights</category>
      <category domain="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/recording_date">2012-01-11</category>
      <description>Professor Anne Deighton (Oxford) gives the fourth talk in The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2012-01-17:101025:171:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0201-deighton.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>Professor Anne Deighton (Oxford) gives the fourth talk in The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:subtitle>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</creativeCommons:license>
      <category domain="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/oer/">ukoer</category>
      <itunes:summary>Professor Anne Deighton (Oxford) gives the fourth talk in The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'? Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>law,socio-legal,norms,norm entrepreneurship,europe,human rights,2012-01-11</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Anne Deighton</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>817</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0201-deighton.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="13090480" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>War, Law and the Cold War: Making the European Convention on Human Rights</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>10</itunes:order>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>socio-legal</category>
      <category>norms</category>
      <category>norm entrepreneurship</category>
      <category>europe</category>
      <category>human rights</category>
      <category domain="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/recording_date">2012-01-11</category>
      <description>Dr Jennifer Jackson-Preece (LSE) gives the second talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?  It would be easy for states not to cooperate, or subvert 'norm production' inside the Council of Europe itself. Yet member states tend not to do this. This is part of what former Council of Europe Secretary General Terry Davis has referred to as 'the best kept secret in Europe'. The workshop sets out to unpack this 'secret' by combining a review of current research on the emergence and institutionalization of international norms using the Council of Europe as a focus for a discussion about the conceptual and empirical challenges of studying norm entrepreneurship.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2012-01-17:100127:611:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0102-jackson-preece.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dr Jennifer Jackson-Preece (LSE) gives the second talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:subtitle>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</creativeCommons:license>
      <category domain="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/oer/">ukoer</category>
      <itunes:summary>Dr Jennifer Jackson-Preece (LSE) gives the second talk for The Evolution of International Norms and Norm Entrepreneurship: The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?  It would be easy for states not to cooperate, or subvert 'norm production' inside the Council of Europe itself. Yet member states tend not to do this. This is part of what former Council of Europe Secretary General Terry Davis has referred to as 'the best kept secret in Europe'. The workshop sets out to unpack this 'secret' by combining a review of current research on the emergence and institutionalization of international norms using the Council of Europe as a focus for a discussion about the conceptual and empirical challenges of studying norm entrepreneurship. Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>law,socio-legal,norms,norm entrepreneurship,europe,human rights,2012-01-11</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Jennifer Jackson-Preece</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>742</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0102-jackson-preece.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="11873801" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>Where do norms come from?</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>11</itunes:order>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>socio-legal</category>
      <category>norms</category>
      <category>norm entrepreneurship</category>
      <category>europe</category>
      <category domain="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/recording_date">2012-01-11</category>
      <description>Professor Jeffrey Checkel (Simon Fraser University, Vancouver), gives the first talk in The Evolution of International Norms and 'Norm Entrepreneurship' The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective workshop This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?  It would be easy for states not to cooperate, or subvert 'norm production' inside the Council of Europe itself. Yet member states tend not to do this. This is part of what former Council of Europe Secretary General Terry Davis has referred to as 'the best kept secret in Europe'. The workshop sets out to unpack this 'secret' by combining a review of current research on the emergence and institutionalization of international norms using the Council of Europe as a focus for a discussion about the conceptual and empirical challenges of studying norm entrepreneurship.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2012-01-17:095855:910:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0101-checkel.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>Professor Jeffrey Checkel (Simon Fraser University, Vancouver), gives the first talk in The Evolution of International Norms and 'Norm Entrepreneurship' The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective workshop Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:subtitle>
      <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</creativeCommons:license>
      <category domain="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/oer/">ukoer</category>
      <itunes:summary>Professor Jeffrey Checkel (Simon Fraser University, Vancouver), gives the first talk in The Evolution of International Norms and 'Norm Entrepreneurship' The Council of Europe in Comparative Perspective workshop This one-day workshop will bring together officials and researchers working on the Council of Europe and international norms more generally. Our emphasis on the Council of Europe gives a concrete empirical starting point for consideration of international norms, norm 'entrepreneurship', and human rights. How do norms come onto the international political agenda? How are they turned into political or legal instruments? Who are the norm 'entrepreneurs'? Why do member states risk becoming entangled in an international normative and legal discourse about human rights that their governments may try to avoid 'at home'?  It would be easy for states not to cooperate, or subvert 'norm production' inside the Council of Europe itself. Yet member states tend not to do this. This is part of what former Council of Europe Secretary General Terry Davis has referred to as 'the best kept secret in Europe'. The workshop sets out to unpack this 'secret' by combining a review of current research on the emergence and institutionalization of international norms using the Council of Europe as a focus for a discussion about the conceptual and empirical challenges of studying norm entrepreneurship. Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>law,socio-legal,norms,norm entrepreneurship,europe,2012-01-11</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Jeffrey Checkel</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>1048</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2012-01-11-fljs-0101-checkel.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="16773954" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>Norm Entrepreneurship - Theoretical and Methodological Challenges</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>12</itunes:order>
      <category>constitution</category>
      <category>democracy</category>
      <category>parliamentary sovereignty</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>society</category>
      <category>politics</category>
      <category domain="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/recording_date">2011-06-16</category>
      <description>In this Annual Lecture, Oxford Professor of Socio-Legal Studies Denis Galligan presents a number of illuminating constitutional snapshots from the last 300 years to explore the limits of representative democracy. and advanced the concept of the People as corporation to account for the constitutional prominence of social justice and rights at the expense of provisions for direct political representation</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2011-06-20:123858:155:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2011-06-16-fljs-galligan.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this Annual Lecture, Oxford Professor of Socio-Legal Studies Denis Galligan presents a number of illuminating constitutional snapshots from the last 300 years to explore the limits of representative democracy.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In this Annual Lecture, Oxford Professor of Socio-Legal Studies Denis Galligan presents a number of illuminating constitutional snapshots from the last 300 years to explore the limits of representative democracy. and advanced the concept of the People as corporation to account for the constitutional prominence of social justice and rights at the expense of provisions for direct political representation </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>constitution,democracy,parliamentary sovereignty,law,society,politics,2011-06-16</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Denis Galligan</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>3387</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/2011-06-16-fljs-galligan.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="54195967" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:38:58 +0100</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>The Indirect Origins of the Judicial Constitution: 2011 Annual Lecture in Law and Society</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>13</itunes:order>
      <category>constitutions</category>
      <category>politics</category>
      <category>history</category>
      <category>democracy</category>
      <category>government</category>
      <category domain="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/recording_date">2010-11-13</category>
      <description>This lecture establishes the ten essentials of modern constitutionalism, as first developed in the Virginia Declaration of Rights of 1776 It shows how these essentials gained ground in the evolving American constitutions up to the mid-nineteenth century and how they spread over to Europe in 1789, where the theoretical foundation of modern constitutionalism was established.  The lecture also develops a revisionist approach to the established preeminence of the American and French constitutional traditions and argue for a more global perspective.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2010-11-22:165450:883:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/fljs-dippel-2010.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>This lecture establishes the ten essentials of modern constitutionalism, as first developed in the Virginia Declaration of Rights of 1776</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This lecture establishes the ten essentials of modern constitutionalism, as first developed in the Virginia Declaration of Rights of 1776 It shows how these essentials gained ground in the evolving American constitutions up to the mid-nineteenth century and how they spread over to Europe in 1789, where the theoretical foundation of modern constitutionalism was established.  The lecture also develops a revisionist approach to the established preeminence of the American and French constitutional traditions and argue for a more global perspective. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>constitutions,politics,history,democracy,government,2010-11-13</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Horst Dipple</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>2488</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/fljs-dippel-2010.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="39812011" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>The History of Modern Constitutionalism</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>14</itunes:order>
      <category>Ran Hirschl</category>
      <category>comparative constitutionalism</category>
      <category>constitutional courts</category>
      <description>This lecture by Professor Ran Hirschl explores the strengths and weaknesses of studying comparatively the socio-political foundations of constitutions and constitutional institutions worldwide. The past few decades have seen a sweeping convergence to constitutional supremacy and a corresponding increase in the political importance of constitutional courts worldwide. This trend is widely perceived as a reflection of progressive social or political change, or simply as the result of societies' or politicians' uncritical celebration of rights.  Against this canonical backdrop, a realist approach has emerged that draws on comparative research to provide a richer explanatory account of the causal relationships between constitutional law and various political, social, or economic phenomena. This increasingly prevalent approach goes beyond portrayals of constitutions as aspirational documents or solutions to systemic problems of coordination and commitment. It identifies concrete supply-side factors that are conducive to the establishment, maintenance, and demise of constitutional orders, most notably the changing interests and incentives of pertinent political, judicial, and economic stakeholders.  Drawing on various examples of constitutionalization, Professor Ran Hirschl from the University of Toronto will elucidate the analytical foundations of this emerging approach and its main theoretical insights. The lecture will explore the strengths and weaknesses of studying comparatively the socio-political foundations of constitutions and constitutional institutions worldwide.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2010-05-24:121732:376:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/Ran-Hirschl-audio.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>This lecture by Professor Ran Hirschl explores the strengths and weaknesses of studying comparatively the socio-political foundations of constitutions and constitutional institutions worldwide.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This lecture by Professor Ran Hirschl explores the strengths and weaknesses of studying comparatively the socio-political foundations of constitutions and constitutional institutions worldwide. The past few decades have seen a sweeping convergence to constitutional supremacy and a corresponding increase in the political importance of constitutional courts worldwide. This trend is widely perceived as a reflection of progressive social or political change, or simply as the result of societies' or politicians' uncritical celebration of rights.  Against this canonical backdrop, a realist approach has emerged that draws on comparative research to provide a richer explanatory account of the causal relationships between constitutional law and various political, social, or economic phenomena. This increasingly prevalent approach goes beyond portrayals of constitutions as aspirational documents or solutions to systemic problems of coordination and commitment. It identifies concrete supply-side factors that are conducive to the establishment, maintenance, and demise of constitutional orders, most notably the changing interests and incentives of pertinent political, judicial, and economic stakeholders.  Drawing on various examples of constitutionalization, Professor Ran Hirschl from the University of Toronto will elucidate the analytical foundations of this emerging approach and its main theoretical insights. The lecture will explore the strengths and weaknesses of studying comparatively the socio-political foundations of constitutions and constitutional institutions worldwide. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Ran Hirschl,comparative constitutionalism,constitutional courts</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Ran Hirschl</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>3131</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/Ran-Hirschl-audio.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="50097874" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 12:17:32 +0100</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>Politicizing Law, Judicializing Politics:  A Realist Approach to Comparative Constitutionalism</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>15</itunes:order>
      <category>justice</category>
      <category>human rights</category>
      <description>The former President of the Israeli Supreme Court Aharon Barak addresses the appropriate balance between security and the safeguarding of human rights.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2009-06-05:155018:124:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/barak-medium-audio.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>The former President of the Israeli Supreme Court Aharon Barak addresses the appropriate balance between security and the safeguarding of human rights.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>The former President of the Israeli Supreme Court Aharon Barak addresses the appropriate balance between security and the safeguarding of human rights. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>justice,human rights</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Aharon Barak</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>4325</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/barak-medium-audio.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="69219099" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:50:18 +0100</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>Human Rights and their Limitations: The Role of Proportionality</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>16</itunes:order>
      <category>social reponsibility</category>
      <category>equality</category>
      <category>egalitarian</category>
      <description>John Roemer, Professor of Political Science and Economics at Yale University, explores the historical formulations of responsibility in egalitarian theory, and argues for a more direct and non-contractarian approach to its integration.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2009-04-30:114033:433:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/roemer-medium-audio.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>John Roemer, Professor of Political Science and Economics at Yale University, explores the historical formulations of responsibility in egalitarian theory, and argues for a more direct and non-contractarian approach to its integration.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>John Roemer, Professor of Political Science and Economics at Yale University, explores the historical formulations of responsibility in egalitarian theory, and argues for a more direct and non-contractarian approach to its integration. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>social reponsibility,equality,egalitarian</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>John Roemer</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>4009</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/roemer-medium-audio.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="64147727" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:40:33 +0100</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>Equality in an Era of Responsibility</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>17</itunes:order>
      <category>genocide</category>
      <category>liberal</category>
      <category>criminal</category>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>justice</category>
      <category>Rwanda</category>
      <category>Bosnia</category>
      <category>pluralism</category>
      <category>ICC</category>
      <description>Why do ordinary people perpetrate genocide and crimes against humanity? How can these perpetrators be held accountable? Are international prosecutions effective? Is imprisonment a fitting punishment? This lecture explores the potential and limits of liberal criminal law as a method of accountability in the aftermath of atrocity. Drawing from a variety of case-studies, including Rwanda, Timor-Leste, and Bosnia, the lecture argues that the lexicon of justice should transcend the courtroom and the jailhouse. Although accountability for atrocity is a shared cosmopolitan value, pluralism suggests that the process of accountability could well take different forms in different places, to diversify the post-conflict justice narrative and, it is argued, render it more effective.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2009-01-29:102012:013:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/drumbl-medium-audio.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why do ordinary people perpetrate genocide and crimes against humanity? How can these perpetrators be held accountable? Are international prosecutions effective? Is imprisonment a fitting punishment?</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Why do ordinary people perpetrate genocide and crimes against humanity? How can these perpetrators be held accountable? Are international prosecutions effective? Is imprisonment a fitting punishment? This lecture explores the potential and limits of liberal criminal law as a method of accountability in the aftermath of atrocity. Drawing from a variety of case-studies, including Rwanda, Timor-Leste, and Bosnia, the lecture argues that the lexicon of justice should transcend the courtroom and the jailhouse. Although accountability for atrocity is a shared cosmopolitan value, pluralism suggests that the process of accountability could well take different forms in different places, to diversify the post-conflict justice narrative and, it is argued, render it more effective. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>genocide,liberal,criminal,law,justice,Rwanda,Bosnia,pluralism,ICC</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Mark Drumbl</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>3362</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/drumbl-medium-audio.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="54667555" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>Justice after Atrocity: A Cosmopolitan Pluralist Approach</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>18</itunes:order>
      <category>Labour Law</category>
      <category>Trade Union</category>
      <category>Blair</category>
      <category>Third Way</category>
      <category>Employment</category>
      <description>Professor Collins argues that New Labour was responsible for the real break from the political settlements of the Trade Disputes Act 1906. He suggests that a new social contract is required that constitutionalizes social and economic rights. Blair's Third Way agenda was radically different from the early twentieth century political settlement in three respects. First, it was largely uninterested in the distribution of wealth in society; second, it conducted direct regulation of working conditions where that was believed necessary to support policy goals; third there was an acceptance, inherited from the preceding conservative governments, that individual bargaining in the context of competitive market forces would be the primary determinant of pay and conditions. To many people, what seems to be missing are certain guarantees to prevent a return to the simple free market in labour of the nineteenth century. This concern can be expressed as a need to reinvent the social contract, to rebalance the economic constitution, or to constitutionalize labour law.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2008-12-02:173927:743:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/collins_20081029.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>Professor Collins argues that New Labour was responsible for the real break from the political settlements of the Trade Disputes Act 1906. He suggests that a new social contract is required that constitutionalizes social and economic rights.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Professor Collins argues that New Labour was responsible for the real break from the political settlements of the Trade Disputes Act 1906. He suggests that a new social contract is required that constitutionalizes social and economic rights. Blair's Third Way agenda was radically different from the early twentieth century political settlement in three respects. First, it was largely uninterested in the distribution of wealth in society; second, it conducted direct regulation of working conditions where that was believed necessary to support policy goals; third there was an acceptance, inherited from the preceding conservative governments, that individual bargaining in the context of competitive market forces would be the primary determinant of pay and conditions. To many people, what seems to be missing are certain guarantees to prevent a return to the simple free market in labour of the nineteenth century. This concern can be expressed as a need to reinvent the social contract, to rebalance the economic constitution, or to constitutionalize labour law. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Labour Law,Trade Union,Blair,Third Way,Employment</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Hugh Collins</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>2822</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/collins_20081029.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="24615585" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>Beyond the Third Way in Labour Law: Towards the Constitutionalization of Labour Law?</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>19</itunes:order>
      <category>Courts</category>
      <category>judges</category>
      <category>judicial independence</category>
      <category>democracy</category>
      <description>This Foundation for Law, Justice and Society Annual Lecture, delivered by Professor Cass Sunstein on 24 May 2007, questions the limits and legitimacy of judicial independence in the face of public opinion.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2008-08-11:152844:813:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/fljs_sunstein.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>This Foundation for Law, Justice and Society Annual Lecture, delivered by Professor Cass Sunstein on 24 May 2007, questions the limits and legitimacy of judicial independence in the face of public opinion.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This Foundation for Law, Justice and Society Annual Lecture, delivered by Professor Cass Sunstein on 24 May 2007, questions the limits and legitimacy of judicial independence in the face of public opinion. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Courts,judges,judicial independence,democracy</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Cass Sunstein</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>2806</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/fljs_sunstein.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="11489549" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:28:44 +0100</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>If the Public Would be Outraged by Their Rulings, Should Judges Care?</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>20</itunes:order>
      <category>Welfare</category>
      <category>state</category>
      <category>social contract</category>
      <category>rights</category>
      <description>This lecture, delivered by Lord Raymond Plant on 18 April 2007, opened the inaugural workshop in the Foundation's programme on 'The Social Contract Revisited'.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2008-08-11:152307:237:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/fljs_plant.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>This lecture, delivered by Lord Raymond Plant on 18 April 2007, opened the inaugural workshop in the Foundation's programme on 'The Social Contract Revisited'.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This lecture, delivered by Lord Raymond Plant on 18 April 2007, opened the inaugural workshop in the Foundation's programme on 'The Social Contract Revisited'. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Welfare,state,social contract,rights</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Raymond Plant</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>3490</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/fljs_plant.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="14296272" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:23:07 +0100</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>Contract, Obligation, Rights and Reciprocity in the New Modern Welfare State</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>21</itunes:order>
      <category>Courts</category>
      <category>social policy</category>
      <description>This lecture, delivered by Professor Martin Shapiro on 25 June 2006, opened the inaugural workshop of the Foundation's programme on 'Courts and the Making of Public Policy'</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2008-08-11:151519:084:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/fljs_shapiro.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>This lecture, delivered by Professor Martin Shapiro on 25 June 2006, opened the inaugural workshop of the Foundation's programme on 'Courts and the Making of Public Policy'</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>This lecture, delivered by Professor Martin Shapiro on 25 June 2006, opened the inaugural workshop of the Foundation's programme on 'Courts and the Making of Public Policy' </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>Courts,social policy</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Martin Shapiro</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>3146</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/fljs_shapiro.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="12862166" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:15:19 +0100</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>Courts, Legislatures, Administrators, and the Making of Social Policy</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>22</itunes:order>
      <category>detention without trial</category>
      <category>terrorism</category>
      <category>World War II</category>
      <category domain="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/recording_date">2008-07-07</category>
      <description>Delivered by Prof. AWB Simpson at the Aspen Institute on 7 Jul 08, it gives an account of the response of the courts to detention without trial during WWII. It serves to open a two-day seminar entitled 'In Times of Crisis Can We Trust the Courts?' The lecture argues that the courts largely abandoned any role in protecting civil liberty, on the ground that, under the emergency legislation of the time, this was not their responsibility. It goes on to explain how the ratification of the European Convention on Human Rights, and its incorporation into domestic law under the Human Rights Act of 1998, has radically altered the position, though the inherent problems involved when regular courts become involved in monitoring the activities of security services in times of crisis have not gone away.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2008-08-08:121108:751:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/fljs_simpson.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>Delivered by Prof. AWB Simpson at the Aspen Institute on 7 Jul 08, it gives an account of the response of the courts to detention without trial during WWII. It serves to open a two-day seminar entitled 'In Times of Crisis Can We Trust the Courts?'</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>Delivered by Prof. AWB Simpson at the Aspen Institute on 7 Jul 08, it gives an account of the response of the courts to detention without trial during WWII. It serves to open a two-day seminar entitled 'In Times of Crisis Can We Trust the Courts?' The lecture argues that the courts largely abandoned any role in protecting civil liberty, on the ground that, under the emergency legislation of the time, this was not their responsibility. It goes on to explain how the ratification of the European Convention on Human Rights, and its incorporation into domestic law under the Human Rights Act of 1998, has radically altered the position, though the inherent problems involved when regular courts become involved in monitoring the activities of security services in times of crisis have not gone away. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>detention without trial,terrorism,World War II,2008-07-07</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>AWB Simpson</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>3449</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs/fljs_simpson.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="14201920" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:11:08 +0100</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>FLJS and Aspen Institute Lecture: Detention without Trial in Wartime Britain</title>
    </item>
    <item>
      <itunes:order>23</itunes:order>
      <category>law</category>
      <category>south africa</category>
      <category>chief justice</category>
      <category>socio-economic rights</category>
      <description>In a keynote lecture the Chief Justice of South Africa addressed the relationship between the entrenchment and enforceability of socio-economic rights in South Africa. Chief Justice Langa argued that the Constitution is best understood as a manifesto for positive transformation towards an equal society.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/tag:2008-07-02:123550:374:socleg/fljs-audio</guid>
      <link>http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/chief_justice_sa/chief-justice-sa.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu</link>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a keynote lecture the Chief Justice of South Africa addressed the relationship between the entrenchment and enforceability of socio-economic rights in South Africa.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:summary>In a keynote lecture the Chief Justice of South Africa addressed the relationship between the entrenchment and enforceability of socio-economic rights in South Africa. Chief Justice Langa argued that the Constitution is best understood as a manifesto for positive transformation towards an equal society. </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:keywords>law,south africa,chief justice,socio-economic rights</itunes:keywords>
      <itunes:author>Pius Langa</itunes:author>
      <itunesu:category itunesu:code="110100"/>
      <itunes:duration>2969</itunes:duration>
      <enclosure url="http://media.podcasts.ox.ac.uk/socleg/chief_justice_sa/chief-justice-sa.mp3?CAMEFROM=itunesu" length="27079956" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:35:50 +0100</pubDate>
      <source url="http://rss.oucs.ox.ac.uk/socleg/fljs-audio/rss20.xml?destination=itunesu">Foundation for Law, Justice and Society</source>
      <title>Transformative Constitutionalism and Socio-Economic Rights</title>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

